. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0213040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213040

Table 1. Chlorophyll content and chlorophyll florescence (Fv/Fm ratio) of two chickpea genotypes under consortium and drought condition after 25 days of stress imposition.

Chickpea genotype	Spad Chlorophyll Content		Chlorophyll Florescence (Fv/Fm)		RWC (%)		Protein (μg/g)		Sugar (mg/g)		Phenolics (mg GAE/g)		Shoot dry wt. (g)		Root dry wt. (g)
Chickpea genotype	Cons.	Dro	Cons.	Dro.	Cons.	Dro.	Cons.	Dro.	Cons.	Dro.	Cons.	Dro.	Cons.	Dro.	Cons.	Dro.
Punjab Noor-2009 (Sensitive genotype, G1)	35.6±0.011^a	16.4±0.01^b	0.727±0.014^a	0.317±0.015^b	64±0.02^a	27±0.07^b	1.6±0.003^a	1.2±0.016^b	1.8±0.014^a	0.7±0.001^b	3.1±0.012^a	1.7±0.013^b	10.9±0.15^a	3.11±0.1^b	2.41±0.06^a	0.94±0.03^b
93127 (Tolerant genotype, G2)	46.1±0.021^a	34.4±0.017^b	0.843±0.007^a	0.643±0.03^b	79±0.011^a	55±0.01^b	1.7±0.015^a	1.5±0.023^b	2.3±0.019^a	1.5±0.015^b	3.7±0.08^a	2.6±0.016^b	12.27±0.28^a	6.33±0.21^b	2.4±0.08^a	1.51±0.02^b

Cons-Consortium (Mean±SE); Dro-Drought (Mean±SE); Different letters (i.e. a and b) indicate significant differences (P< .05) among treatments.