Table 2.
Quintiles of toenail arsenic levels |
P for linear trend* |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (lowest) |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5 (highest) | ||
Arsenic, ppm | <0.0593 | 0.0593–0.0827 | 0.0828–0.1119 | 0.1120–0.1691 | ≥0.1692 | |
No. of participants | 821 | 819 | 820 | 822 | 778 | NA |
No. of events | 149 | 122 | 122 | 111 | 95 | NA |
Incidence rate,/1000 person years | 8.96 | 7.22 | 7.32 | 6.70 | 5.93 | |
Model 1b | 1 (Ref.) | 0.85 (0.67, 1.08) | 0.93 (0.73, 1.18) | 0.84 (0.65, 1.08) | 0.77 (0.59, 1.01) | 0.08 |
Model 2c | 1 (Ref.) | 0.95 (0.75, 1.22) | 1.05 (0.82, 1.35) | 1.00 (0.77, 1.29) | 0.90 (0.69, 1.19) | 0.48 |
Model 3d | 1 (Ref.) | 0.95 (0.75, 1.22) | 1.04 (0.81, 1.33) | 1.00 (0.77, 1.30) | 0.96 (0.73, 1.27) | 0.85 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CARDIA, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults; CI, Confidence interval; HR, Hazard ratio; LCω3PUFA, long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NA, not applicable.
All models were constructed using the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.
Model 1: adjustment for age (continuous), sex, race, study center, and baseline glucose levels (continuous).
Model 2: model 1 with additional adjustment for baseline BMI (continuous).
Model 3: model 2 with additional adjustment for education (<12, 12, 12.1–15.9, 16, or ≥16 years), current smoking status (yes or no), alcohol consumption (0, 0.1–9.9, 10.0–19.9, or ≥20 g/day), physical activity (quintiles), and family history of diabetes (yes or no).
P for linear trend was examined by using medians of toenail arsenic across its quintiles in the models.