Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 26;10:397. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00397

Table 5.

Summary of regression analysis for variables predicting relationship satisfaction (QMI) in male transplant recipients (n = 36).

B SE B β p
Males total DC 0.357 0.080 0.747 0.000
Males similarity index-self-evaluation (DCI) –0.623 0.242 –0.491 0.016
Females congruence index (DCI) 0.416 0.205 0.365 0.053
Males similarity index – partner-evaluation (DCI) 0.198 0.201 0.203 0.333
Males congruence index (DCI) 0.227 0.240 0.185 0.355
Males age 0.092 0.067 0.185 0.181
Males perceived similarity (DCI) 0.143 0.187 0.125 0.454
Females perceived similarity (DCI) –0.090 0.161 –0.098 0.583
Females total DC –0.021 0.051 –0.070 0.680

DC, dyadic coping; DCI, Dyadic Coping Inventory; QMI, Quality of Marriage Index. Significant differences in bold.