Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 6;26(4):1134–1141. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07191-4

Table 2.

Inguinal lymph node metastases and histopathologic characteristics and follow-up evaluation

Total Curative intent Palliative intent
n = 27
n (%)
n = 19
n (%)
n = 8
n (%)
Time from Dx of rectal cancer until ILNM
 Median months (IQR) 6 (1–30) 4 (0–4) 24 (4–56)
Onset of ILNM
 Synchronous 15 (56) 13 (68) 2 (25)
 Metachronous 12 (44) 6 (32) 6 (75)
Location of ILNM
 Unilateral 19 (70) 14 (74) 5 (63)
 Bilateral 8 (30) 5 (26) 3 (38)
Solitary ILNM
 No 8 (30) 3 (16) 5 (63)
 Yes 19 (70) 16 (84) 3 (38)
Distant metastases elsewhere
 Liver 1 (4) 1 (5) 0 ()
 Lung 1 (4) 0 () 1 (13)
 Peritoneal 2 (7) 1 (5) 1 (13)
 Iliac lymph nodes and paraaortic 1 (4) 0 (0) 1 (13)
 Lung and spinal bone 1 (4) 0 (0) 0 ()
 Liver and iliac lymph nodes 2 (7) 1 (5) 1 (13)
 Lung and iliac lymph nodes 2 (7) 0 (0) 1 (13)
Neoadjuvant CTx for ILNM
 No 17 (63) 9 (47) N/A
 Yes 10 (27) 10 (53) N/A
ILND
 No dissection 10 (37) 2 (11) 8 (100)
 Upfront 7 (26) 7 (37) 0 (0)
 Simultaneous with rectal tumor 4 (15) 4 (21) 0 (0)
 Metachronous during FU of rectal cancer 6 (22) 6 (37) 0 (0)
Histopathology of inguinal lymph nodes specimena
 Positive lymph nodes
  No NA 4 (24) NA
  Yes NA 13 (76) NA
 Total no. of harvested nodes
  Median (range) NA 12 (3–16) NA
 Total no. of positive nodes
  Median (range) NA 1 (0–11) NA
 Follow-up after surgical treatment
 Disease status at last follow-up
  No evidence of disease NA 5 (29) NA
  Distant metastases NA 7 (41) NA
  Local recurrence of rectal cancer and NA 7 (41) NA
 Distant metastases
  Inguinal lymph node recurrenceb NA 2 (12) NA

Numbers do not add up due to rounding

Dx diagnosis, ILNM inguinal lymph node metastases, IQR interquartile range, CTx chemotherapy, ILND inguinal lymph node dissection, FU follow-up, NA not applicable

a17 patients and 22 dissection specimens, due to five bilateral ILN

bNodal recurrence in dissected site