Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;9:3330. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40119-2

Table 3.

Modelled and adopted optimum conditions for the significantly influential experimental factors, partial and global desirability of the peak areas, the predicted areas (and their 95% confidence limits) and the experimentally obtained peak areas.

Factor Setting Modified
Desorption flow (A), mL/min 95.1069 95
Cryofocusing Temperature (B), °C 31.71 20
Cryo-desorption Temperature (C), °C 294.698 295
Response Optimized Prediction Lower 95.0% Limit Upper 95.0% Limit Desirability Validation (±SD, n = 3) CV (%) of validated experimental values
TEP yes 1061000.0 648994.0 1474000.0 0.4786 978917.0 ± 112894.0 11.5
TPP yes 4620000.0 3513000.0 5728000.0 0.8734 3702588.0 ± 334614.0 9.0
TNBP yes 3243000.0 2480000.0 4007000.0 0.7477 3046976.0 ± 301440.0 9.9
TCEP yes 739188.0 621161.0 857215.0 0.7102 595104.0 ± 49439.9 8.3
TCIPP yes 362965.0 276627.0 449303.0 0.6574 326112.0 ± 21869.2 6.7
TDCIPP yes 301971.0 252442.0 351500.0 0.5049 241696.0 ± 18558.9 7.7
TBOEP yes 285892.0 243703.0 328081.0 0.5896 217899.0 ± 26699.6 12.3
TPHP yes 1275000,0 1026000.0 1524000.0 0.8499 1107435.0 ± 90919.8 8.2
EHDPP yes 3015000.0 2617000.0 3413000.0 0.8568 2295061.0 ± 260412.0 11.3
TEHP yes 8525000.0 7159000.0 9890000.0 0.9383 6339173.0 ± 682202.0 10.8
Global desirability 0.7299