Table 6.
Comparison with other TE studies on SVOCs.
| Sorbent | Optimization | Analytes | Flow | DTp | DTm | TDsTr | CryoT | CryoDT | CDTm | MQL (ng/m3) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenax TA | Univariate | OPEs/PEs | 50 | 320 | 10 | 0 | 320 | 5 | 7.0–670.0 | 5 | |
| PDMS/Tenax TA | Univariate | FRs | 20 | 300 | 10 | — | 10 | 400 | 10 | 0.02–0.7 | 7 |
| PDMS | Univariate | OPEs | 76 | 320 | 10 | 320 | −40 | 320 | 2 | 0.1–0.8a | 8 |
| Tenax TA | Univariate | PCPs | 100 | 320 | 15 | — | 0 | 320 | 10 | 0.1–16.7 | 33 |
| Tenax TA | Multivariate | OPEs | 95 | 290 | 10 | 290 | 20 | 295 | 6 | 0.07–1.8 | This Study |
DTp; Desorption Temperature, DTm; Desorption Time, TDsTr; Thermal desorption system transfer line temperature, CryoT; Cryofocusing Temperature, CryoDT; Cryo – desorption Temperature, PEs; Phthalate esters, PCPs; Personal care products, FRs; Flame retardants.
aUnits in pg/m3.