Table 5.
Randomized control trial study quality.
| Described as a RCT? | Was the method of randomization adequate? | Was the treatment allocation concealed? | Were the investigators blinded? | Were groups similar at baseline on important characteristics that could affect outcomes? | Was overall drop-out rate ≤20% | Was the differential drop-out rate at endpoint ≤15%? | High adherence to intervention protocols? | Were other interventions avoided or similar in the groups? | Outcome measures clear, reliable and valid? Implemented consistently? | Sample size sufficient to detect difference with at least 80% power? | Were outcomes reported or subgroups analyzed pre-specified? | Were all randomized participants analyzed in the group they were originally assigned? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suboc et al., 2014 | Y | NR | NR | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Study quality assessment of the RCT study included in question 2 developed by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) (Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies, 2014). RCT, randomized controlled trial; Y, yes; N, no; NR, not reported.