Table 4.
Study Author, Year [Reference] | No. of CRBSIs | Catheter-Days | Incident Rate, per 1000 Catheter-Days |
---|---|---|---|
Saad, 1999 [14] | 86 | 15636a | 5.5 |
Stevenson et al, 2002 [15] | 123 | 53947a | 2.28b |
Maki et al, 2006 [16] | 596 | 372500a | 1.6 |
Camins et al, 2010 (control group) [17] | 37 | 17126a | 2.16b |
Al-Solaiman et al, 2011 [18] | 184 | 58044a | 3.17 |
Hymes et al, 2017 (control group) [12] | 107 | 177337 | 0.59 |
Rojas-Moreno et al, 2016 [13] | 134 | 51341a | 2.61 |
Present study | 101 | 120138 | 0.84 |
Abbreviation: CRBSI, catheter-related bloodstream infection.
aThe catheter-days were calculated based on the number of CRBSI and incident rate. For example, in [13], catheter days = 1000 × 134 / 2.61.
bRate was reported as 5.2 bloodstream infections (BSIs) per 1000 hemodialysis sessions in control period in [17]. In a similar study by Taylor et al, hemodialysis sessions averaged 1 per 2.41 patient days (28.81 per 10000 hemodialysis procedures / 11.97 per 10000 patient-days) [19]. Thus, we converted 5.2 BSIs per 1000 hemodialysis sessions to 2.16 (ie, 5.2 / 2.41) BSIs/patient-days.