Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 8;75(Pt 3):332–337. doi: 10.1107/S2056989019002056

Table 3. Experimental details.

  I II
Crystal data
Chemical formula [Ni(C16H36N4)]2(ClO4)4·H2O [Ni(C16H36N4)]Br2·3H2O
M r 1102.21 557.06
Crystal system, space group Monoclinic, P21/c Orthorhombic, F d d2
Temperature (K) 295 295
a, b, c (Å) 8.906 (4), 29.412 (11), 19.505 (9) 60.3649 (18), 19.8364 (9), 7.9773 (3)
α, β, γ (°) 90, 107.030 (19), 90 90, 90, 90
V3) 4885 (4) 9552.2 (6)
Z 4 16
Radiation type Cu Kα Mo Kα
μ (mm−1) 3.60 4.17
Colour Orange Yellow
Crystal size (mm) 0.52 × 0.25 × 0.11 0.37 × 0.15 × 0.10
 
Data collection
Diffractometer Picker 4-circle Enraf–Nonius KappaCCD
Radiation source sealed X-ray tube fine-focus sealed tube
Absorption correction Gaussian (Busing & Levy, 1957) Part of the refinement model (ΔF) (SCALEPACK; Otwinowski & Minor, 1997)
T min, T max 0.454, 0.686 0.34, 0.67
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections 7450, 6870, 4899 41142, 5382, 4897
R int 0.060 0.096
θmax (°) 58.4 27.5
(sin θ/λ)max−1) 0.552 0.649
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.043, 0.109, 1.04 0.035, 0.085, 1.04
No. of reflections 6870 5382
No. of parameters 686 253
No. of restraints 184 4
H-atom treatment H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3) 0.30, −0.31 0.88, −0.56

Data reduction followed procedures in Corfield et al. (1973). Structure solution was by the heavy-atom method with local programs. Computer programs: Corfield & Gainsford (1972), KappaCCD Server Software (Nonius, 1997), DENZO and SCALEPACK (Otwinowski & Minor, 1997), SHELXL2017 (Sheldrick, 2015), ORTEPIII (Burnett & Johnson, 1996), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010).