Table 2.
Respondents (n = 122) | |
---|---|
ICP insertion | |
Neurosurgeon (attending) | 47 (39%) |
Neurosurgeon (resident) | 38 (31%) |
Neurosurgeon (attending + resident) | 32 (26%) |
Emergency surgeon (attending) | 1 (1%) |
Emergency surgeon (attending) + neurosurgeon (attending) | 1 (1%) |
Other | 3 (2%) |
ICP monitoring in patients (%) at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
0% | 15 (13%) |
< 10% | 21 (17%) |
10–30% | 35 (29%) |
30–50% | 4 (3%) |
50–70% | 15 (12%) |
70–99% | 23 (19%) |
100% | 9 (7%) |
Protocol for ICP monitoring in patients at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
Yes | 48 (39%) |
No | 74 (61%) |
Importance of ICP monitoring in patients at risk of IH during EES (immediately after admission) | |
Not important | 1 (1%) |
Somewhat important | 19 (15%) |
Important | 40 (33%) |
Very important | 46 (38%) |
Mandatory | 16 (13%) |
Abbreviations: ICP intracranial pressure, IH intracranial hypertension, EES emergency extracranial surgery