Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;19:144. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3969-5

Table 2.

Percent of hospital visits (based on proportions) correctly predicted

METRIC, FUNCTION MIN MOD HOSP HIGH
E2SFCA, DLL 64.17 61.55 57.67 53.60
E2SFCA, GAUS 57.15 61.15 63.18 64.22
E2SFCA, EXP 66.14 64.53 59.85 51.45
E2SFCA, LCDF 63.62 65.57 61.43 56.95
M2SFCA, DLL 64.75 68.08 68.90 66.88
M2SFCA, GAUS 52.33 57.52 60.27 62.16
M2SFCA, EXP 64.31 67.03 68.53 63.28
M2SFCA, LCDF 57.82 65.45 68.23 67.66
3SFCA, DLL 64.60 67.05 67.65 65.99
3SFCA, GAUS 52.66 58.12 60.96 62.75
3SFCA, EXP 64.82 66.96 68.10 63.10
3SFCA, LCDF 58.57 65.70 67.93 67.35
H3SFCA, DLL 57.18 57.23 55.92 53.09
H3SFCA, GAUS 50.10 53.14 54.59 55.54
H3SFCA, EXP 57.28 57.78 56.56 50.55
H3SFCA, LCDF 54.04 57.43 57.11 54.95
DIST, DLL 53.65 49.99 45.76 41.75
DIST, GAUS 53.61 56.03 56.21 55.63
DIST, EXP 56.28 53.42 47.82 39.50
DIST, LCDF 57.46 55.18 49.57 44.90
HUFF, DLL 44.99 41.44 37.92 34.66
HUFF, GAUS 49.23 49.88 49.28 48.19
HUFF, EXP 48.15 44.88 39.78 32.97
HUFF, LCDF 51.10 46.80 41.34 37.34

Legend: The spatial accessibility metric and decay function are in the rows and the decay functions’ parameter settings are in the columns. The highest accuracy combination for each metric is in bold text