Table 1. Cases with concordant results for detection of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts using the BML and in-house methods.
Patient # | Timing of detection | IS % ratio | TKI type after recurrence | |
---|---|---|---|---|
(month) | BML method | In-house method | ||
6 | 9 | 0.01 | 0.0289 | Dasatinib |
7 | 2 | 0.04 | 0.0621 | Imatinib |
8 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.0259 | Dasatinib |
9 | 3 | 0.20 | 0.4548 | Dasatinib |
10 | 1 | 0.02 | 0.0648 | Dasatinib |
11 | 1 | 0.96 | 0.4306 | Dasatinib |
12 | 2 | 0.13 | 0.0700 | Imatinib |
13 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.0121 | Dasatinib |
14 | 3 | 0.01 | 0.0069 | Dasatinib |
15 | 1 | <0.01 | 0.0093 | Imatinib |
16 | 1 | 0.04 | 0.0081 | Dasatinib |
17 | 3 | 0.16 | 0.2517 | Dasatinib |
18 | 2 | 0.05 | 0.0292 | Imatinib |
19 | 2 | 0.02 | 0.0672 | Imatinib |
20 | 5 | 0.03 | 0.1236 | Dasatinib |
IS, International scale.
Timing of detection: time point when BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts were detected.