Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;14(3):e0207170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207170

Table 2. Cases with discordant results for detection of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts using the BML and in-house methods.

Patient # Timing of detection (month) IS % ratio TKI type after recurrence
BML method In-house method In-house method ODK-1201
21 15 12 0.0201 ND Dasatinib
22 18 5 0.0041 ND Dasatinib
23 1 0 0.0081 NA Dasatinib
24 11 4 0.0184 0.0124 Dasatinib
25 5 3 0.0584 0.0107 Dasatinib
26 1 0 0.0326 0.0021 Dasatinib
27 4 2 0.0269 0.0061 Dasatinib
28 15 12 0.0141 0.0054 Dasatinib
29 2 1 0.0115 0.0040 Dasatinib
30 1 0 0.0127 NA Imatinib
31 3 2 0.0284 0.0186 Dasatinib
32 1 0 0.0120 ND Imatinib
33 5 4 0.0353 0.0214 Dasatinib
34 4 3 0.0481 0.0039 Dasatinib
35 2 0 0.0069 0.0024 Imatinib
36 1 0 0.0194 0.0054 Dasatinib
37 6 3 0.0010 0.0049 Dasatinib
38 3 0 0.0082 ND Dasatinib
39 1 0 0.0175 0.0058 Imatinib
40 1 0 0.0084 0.0045 Dasatinib
41 3 1 0.0019 ND Dasatinib

IS, International scale; ND, not detected; NA, not applicable.

Timing of detection: time point when BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts were detected.