. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Health Behav Policy Rev. 2018 Jul;5(4):72–82. doi: 10.14485/HBPR.5.4.8

Table 4:

The Relationship between the Strength of the Written School Policy and Student E-cigarette Use Behaviors (n = 2755; N = 310,412)^a

	Administrator perceives e-cigarettes were an issue^b (n = 809; N = 74,446)			Administrator perceives e-cigarettes were NOT an issue^b (n = 1946; N = 235,966)

	OR	95% CI	p-value	OR	95% CI	p-value
Ever e-cigarette use
No (0)	Ref	----	----	Ref	----	----
Low (10–12)	0.22	(0.08–0.56)	<.01	1.28	(0.40–4.03)	.67
Moderate (13)	0.16	(0.01–1.72)	.12	0.99	(0.37–2.68)	.99
High (14–16)	0.90	(0.58–1.41)	.62	1.01	(0.39–2.59)	.99
Past 30 day e-cigarette use
No (0)	Ref	----	----	Ref	----	----
Low (10–12)	0.23	(0.10–0.52)	<.01	0.70	(0.30–1.65)	.41
Moderate (13)	0.14	(0.03–0.71)	.02	1.41	(0.55–3.61)	.46
High (14–16)	1.23	(0.65–2.33)	.49	0.97	(0.38–2.50)	.95
Susceptibility to e-cigarette use
No (0)	Ref	----	----	Ref	----	----
Low (10–12)	0.54	(0.46–0.64)	<.01	1.13	(0.54–2.37)	.74
Moderate (13)	0.23	(0.10–0.50)	<.01	0.89	(0.53–1.48)	.64
High (14–16)	1.02	(0.59–1.79)	.93	0.94	(0.47–1.89)	.86
Perceived peer use
No (0)	Ref	----	----	Ref	----	----
Low (10–12)	0.12	(0.05–0.32)	<.01	1.06	(0.35–3.18)	.92
Moderate (13)	0.09	(0.01–1.23)	.07	0.92	(0.39–2.21)	.86
High (14–16)	0.45	(0.24–0.85)	.02	0.95	(0.29–3.13)	.93

Note.

^a:

Models are adjusted for past 30 day other tobacco use from the TATAMS student survey

^b:

Analyzed from the E-cigarette School Policy Interview