Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 4;218(3):1027–1038. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201806148

Table 2. Image processing report.

Parameter Data set 1 Data set 2
Micrographs
 Camera K2, superresolution K2, superresolution
 Magnification 48077 48077
 Number 218 1136
 Tilt (°) 0 30
 Frames per micrograph 54 50
 Frame rate (/s) 4 4
 Dose per frame (e/pixel) 1.08a 0.76a
 Accumulated dose (e2) 51 33
 Frame alignment bseries bseries
CTF
 Defocus range (µm) 1.04–2.92 1.06–3.23
 Correction Phase flip Phase flip
Particles
 Picked 39536 26702
 Used in final 2D averages/3D reconstruction 19701 (50%) 18646 (70%)
Alignment
 Initial reference map PBD: 3JD6 PBD: 3JD6
 Low-pass filter limit (Å) 35 20
 Projection-matching algorithm Cross-correlation Cross-correlation
 Number of iterations 5 4
Reconstruction
 Classes 70 1
 Size 330 × 330 × 1 224 × 224 × 224
 Pixel size (Å) 1.04 1.04
 Symmetry C1 C2
 Resolution limit (Å) 2.1 3.0
 Resolution estimate (Å, FSC0.143) 5–25 10.0
 Masked No Yes
 Sharpened No Yesb
 Filtered No Low-pass to 10 Å
a

The micrographs were taken in superresolution mode and subsequently binned for further processing (final size: 3838 × 3710).

b

Amplitudes weighted to match PDB accession no. 3JD6.