Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 12;69(680):e171–e181. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X701297

Table 2.

Quality appraisal for included research papers, n = 27

Quality appraisal question Yes, n (%) No, n (%)
Does the research involve qualitative methods of data collection and analysis? 27 (100) 0 (0)
Does the research have clear aims and objectives? 26 (96) 1 (4)
Were the data collected in a way that addressed the research aim? 23 (85) 4 (15)
Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous to address the aims of the research? 23 (85) 4 (15)
Can one be confident that all the relevant data were taken into account? 22 (81) 5 (19)
Were sufficient data presented to support the interpretations made? 20 (74) 7 (26)
Did the study demonstrate theoretical insight, novel findings, or novel perspectives? 27 (100) 0 (0)
What was the quality of the reporting methods? Good Acceptable Poor
18 (67) 7 (26) 2 (7)
Overall quality assessment Very good Good Not very good
11 (41) 7 (26) 9 (33)