Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 29;56(2):674–682. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3522-2

Table 3.

Pearson correlation analysis between milling indices

HRY WI Es DOM TR
HRY 1
WI − 0.829** 1
Es − 0.888** 0.814** 1**
DOM − 0.818** 0.940** 0.769** 1
TR − 0.900** 0.849** 0.885** 0.846** 1

HRY head rice yield, WI whiteness index, Es specific energy consumption, DOM degree of milling, TR temperature rise. **Extremely significant at p < 0.01