Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 27;6:49. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00049

Table 2.

Estimates, standard errors, z-values, and p values from the GLM used in Experiment 2 in which the dependent variable was outcome in the assistance dog program and IFT scores were the predictor variables.

Predictor variables (IFT scores) Estimate Std. error z value Pr(>|z|)
Intercept 2.89 0.47 6.09 0.00
Physical exam: body tension 0.16 0.04 3.87 0.00
Sudden noise: conclusion 0.15 0.05 3.32 0.00
Unfamiliar dog: recall 0.12 0.04 2.80 0.01
Prey: initial reaction 0.17 0.07 2.51 0.01
Sudden noise: initial reaction 0.11 0.04 2.47 0.01
Physical exam: ease of handling 0.10 0.04 2.36 0.02
Unfamiliar dog: initial reaction 0.09 0.04 2.21 0.03
Looming object: initial reaction 0.09 0.04 2.14 0.03
Unfamiliar dog: tail position 0.16 0.08 1.90 0.06
Looming object: second walk by 0.25 0.15 1.65 0.10
Sudden noise: barks or growls 1.15 0.77 1.49 0.14
Looming object: increase in activity 0.25 0.17 1.48 0.14
Threatening stranger: initial reaction 0.07 0.05 1.46 0.14
Threatening stranger: recovery 0.06 0.04 1.43 0.15
Prey: conclusion 0.06 0.05 1.14 0.26
Threatening stranger: increase in activity 0.08 0.07 1.12 0.26
Threatening stranger: barks or growls 0.13 0.14 0.95 0.34
Physical exam: vocalization 0.03 0.04 0.87 0.38
Unfamiliar dog: barks or growls 0.14 0.17 0.85 0.40
Prey: recovery −0.04 0.08 −0.51 0.61