Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 15;101(3):141–149. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0010

Table 1.

Sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography carotid angiography based on North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria

Stenosis (%) CT type Carotid arteries (n) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Reference
> 70 Helical/spiral 56 100 100 Link et al12
Dual source 80 80 91 Biermann et al13
Dual source 80 100 84
Axial 44 67 96 Leclerc et al14
Axial 236 98.3 100 Moll et al15
Helical/spiral 44 100 100 Randoux et al16
Helical/spiral 59 65 100 Patel et al17
Multi-detector 129 90.9 54.9 Bucek et al18
Multi-detector 268 88.2 92.4 Bartlett et al19
Helical/spiral 73 75 96 Silvennoin et al20
Axial 45 90 87 Howard et al21
Multi-detector 336 95 99 Anzidei et al22
Not known 180 78 93 Marquering et al23
Dual source 80 80 100 Tsiflikas et al24
Dual source 80 91 83
Axial 48 81.8 100 Gupta et al25
> 60 Axial 96 87 90 Magarelli et al26
Occlusion Axial 236 100 100 Moll et al15
> 50 Multi-detector 129 95.8 59.6 Bucek et al18
Multi-detector 268 75 93.8 Bartlett et al19
Helical/spiral 73 88 82 Silvennoin et al20
Not known 180 75 98 Marquering et al23
Axial 48 91.7 72.7 Gupta et al27
Axial 72 85 83
< 50 Multi-detector 268 95.2 93.2 Bartlett et al19

CT, computed tomography.