Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 5;9:3587. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39667-4

Table 2.

Summary of the NGS analysis of targeted capture experiments.

Clone Target-enrichment method Library Insert Size (bp) Total Reads (M) % Mapped Mean Coverage Vector Coverage Vector Copy No Fold Enrichment
AE54SL RGEN-D (B) 630 22.6 98.4 2 20.1 ND 5
AE54SL xGen 372 32.3 99.8 3.2 14,078* (354,049) ND 2,301
AE54SL WGS 615/3,985 344.7 92 27 46 4 1
AD49ZG RGEN-TdT 641 17.3 95.2 0.5 56.8 ND 56.8
AD49ZG RGEN-D (A) 655 18.2 94.9 0.26 16.9 ND 16.3
AD49ZG xGen 378 42.2 99.4 5 8,110* (540,685) ND 821
AD49ZG TLA 193 1.24 99.8 0.05 905* (8,625) ND 9,106
AD49ZG WGS (Illumina) 450 754.9 97.9 68.3 133.1 4 1
AD49ZG WGS (PacBio) 13,200 (N50) 6.9 84.9 14.5 26.4 4 1
AD49ZH RGEN-TdT 400 10 94.2 0.28 82 ND 29.2
AD49ZH xGen 403 44.2 99.3 5.3 98,006* (970,360) ND 1,849
AD49ZH WGS (Illumina) 454 777.4 98 70.1 728.9 20 1

*Vector coverage after removal of PCR duplicates. PCR duplication rates were calculated according to Bansal40. The integrated vector copy numbers were calculated using the WGS Illumina® and PacBio data, as ratios of the vector coverage to the mean chromosome coverage. The fold enrichments were normalized by the corresponding vector copy numbers. Abbreviations used: ND, not determined; WGS, whole genome sequencing; TLA, targeted locus amplification6; xGen, hybridization capture of DNA libraries for NGS target enrichment1; RGEN-D, RGEN-TdT, methods developed in this paper (Figs 1 and 2).