Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 20;21(2):e12783. doi: 10.2196/12783

Table 7.

Performance in the English subtask (12 participating systems and 2 baseline systems).

System IDa Exact matchb F1 Precision Recall Hamming loss
Micro Macro Micro Macro Micro Macro
NAIST-en-2 0.880 0.920 0.906 0.899 0.887 0.941 0.925 0.019
NAIST-en-3 0.878 0.919 0.904 0.899 0.885 0.940 0.924 0.019
NAIST-en-1 0.877 0.918 0.904 0.899 0.887 0.938 0.921 0.020
SVM-bigram 0.800 0.866 0.856 0.865 0.849 0.868 0.865 0.031
UE-en-1 0.789 0.858 0.848 0.846 0.831 0.871 0.876 0.034
SVM-unigram 0.783 0.858 0.845 0.851 0.830 0.864 0.864 0.033
NTTMU-en-2 0.773 0.856 0.849 0.807 0.796 0.911 0.918 0.036
NTTMU-en-3 0.758 0.845 0.828 0.836 0.818 0.854 0.844 0.037
UE-en-2 0.745 0.821 0.809 0.861 0.838 0.786 0.800 0.040
UE-en-3 0.739 0.820 0.815 0.870 0.851 0.776 0.795 0.040
AKBL-en-2 0.734 0.819 0.799 0.832 0.808 0.806 0.793 0.042
AKBL-en-3 0.716 0.804 0.787 0.853 0.834 0.760 0.747 0.043
NTTMU-en-1 0.619 0.770 0.777 0.734 0.733 0.809 0.835 0.056
AKBL-en-1 0.613 0.772 0.755 0.656 0.649 0.936 0.945 0.065

aThe system ID comprises the group ID (see Multimedia Appendix 1), the abbreviation of subtask (en indicates English subtask), and the system number from 1 to 3 since each group can submit three systems per subtask.

bThe results are ordered by exact match accuracy.