Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2019 Feb 1;14(2):186–191. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.8b01079

Table 1:

EC50 and IC50 values and efficacy data for AHL analogs in the E. coli and P. aeruginosa RhlR reporter strains.a Data for control compounds shaded in grey.

E. coli P. aeruginosa
Compound EC50 (μM) 95% CI (μM)b Max. RhlR Activation (%) EC50 (μM) 95% CI (μM)b Max. RhlR Activation (%)
34 5.94 4.19 – 8.41 93 7.35 5.26 – 10.3 96
35 1.72 1.34 – 2.21 110 1.65 1.24 – 2.21 90
36 7.58 5.80 – 9.90 100 11.24 7.41 – 17.1 96
37 0.463 0.336 – 0.640 93 2.58 1.86 – 3.56 91
BHL 8.95 5.86 – 13.7 100 8.08 6.09 – 10.7 100
7 1.02 0.67 – 1.55 110 1.42 1.08 – 1.86 94
17 1.78 1.37 – 2.31 100 1.41 1.14 – 1.74 96
S4 1.58 1.32 – 1.90 100 1.22 1.03 – 1.45 110
IC50 (μM) 95% CI (μM)b Max. RhlR Inhibition (%) IC50 (μM) 95% CI (μM)b Max. RhlR Inhibition (%)
38 26.7 10.1 – 71.0 32
41 >100 56
42 19.6 14.3 – 26.9 81 31.4 19.6 – 50.4 85
E22 17.3 12.1 – 24.6 74 23.9 16.6 – 31.6 96
a

See Methods for assay details. For full dose response curves, see Figures S1–S4.

b

CI = confidence interval.