Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 6;2019(3):CD010355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010355.pub3

Comparison 1. NIPPV versus no NIPPV.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pulmonary complications 5 346 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.72, 1.47]
1.1 Bi‐level 2 53 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.27, 2.13]
1.2 CPAP 3 293 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.74, 1.59]
2 Rate of intubation 2 69 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.25, 1.20]
2.1 Bi‐level 2 69 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.55 [0.25, 1.20]
3 Mortality 5 259 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.60 [0.24, 1.53]
3.1 Bi‐level 3 101 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.33 [0.10, 1.08]
3.2 CPAP 2 158 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.06 [0.33, 28.67]
4 Length of intensive care unit stay 2 69 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.75 [‐3.93, 2.43]
4.1 Bi‐level 2 69 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.75 [‐3.93, 2.43]
5 Length of hospital stay 4 209 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.12 [‐6.15, 5.90]
5.1 Bi‐level 3 101 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [‐9.81, 11.84]
5.2 CPAP 1 108 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [‐0.94, 1.74]