Roceto 2014.
Methods | RCT October 2007 ‐ November 2009 |
|
Participants | 60 patients Patients who underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer |
|
Interventions | Intervention: NIPPV (CPAP) for three days starting in the immediate postoperative period + chest physiotherapy Control: Chest physiotherapy |
|
Outcomes | Oxygen index Air leaks Dyspnea scale Pain scale |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Opaque and sealed envelopes |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Both the investigators and the patient knew to which group the patient was allocated |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome data were objective |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Losses: 20. Reasons for exclusion after randomisation were described |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | No evidence of selective reporting |
Other bias | Low risk | No evidence of other bias |