Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 6;2019(3):CD010355. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010355.pub3

Roceto 2014.

Methods RCT
October 2007 ‐ November 2009
Participants 60 patients
Patients who underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer
Interventions Intervention: NIPPV (CPAP) for three days starting in the immediate postoperative period + chest physiotherapy
Control: Chest physiotherapy
Outcomes Oxygen index
Air leaks
Dyspnea scale
Pain scale
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Opaque and sealed envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk Both the investigators and the patient knew to which group the patient was allocated
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Outcome data were objective
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Losses: 20. Reasons for exclusion after randomisation were described
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting
Other bias Low risk No evidence of other bias