Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2018 Feb 9;25(9):1118–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.028

TABLE 3.

Association of Timely Follow-up and Facility-level Communication Modality

Communication Type Patient Misses Scheduled Appointment for Additional Imaging
Facilities Endorsing in Survey (%) Follow-up in 1–15 d When Endorsed (%) vs Not Endorsed (%) Impact on Timely Follow-up After Adjustment* (P Value) OR (95% CI)
To patient
 Phone 71.4 85.5 vs 72.8 .08 1.81 (0.93–3.53)
 Mail 32.1 85.1 vs 80.3 .0429 1.65 (1.02–2.69)
 Patient portal 3.6 81.8 vs 82.4 <.0001 2.05 (1.73–2.41)
 In person 0.0
To provider
 Phone 28.6 89.3 vs 77.3 .0012 2.61 (1.46–4.66)
 Mail 17.9 76.9 vs 83.1 .63 1.30 (0.45–3.79)
 Electronic medical record 21.4 78.0 vs 83.3 .95 0.98(0.49–1.93)
 Fax 7.1 82.2 vs 82.5 .57 0.79 (0.35–1.79)

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PROSPR, Population-based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens.

*

The generalized estimating equation model controlled for age, race and ethnicity, PROSPR site, and the correlation of outcomes within a radiology facility. Results are presented for the patient and the provider among the 28 facilities for the scenario of patient misses a scheduled appointment for additional imaging.