Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Prev Med. 2019 Mar;56(3):376–382. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.10.021

Table 2.

Adjusted Risk Ratios (95% CIs)a for Prenatal Care Initiation and Frequency

Dependent variable Disability status Disability type
No disability (n=6,080,127) Any disability (n=31,101) Physical (n=26,084) Hearing (n=2,550) Vision (n=1,231) IDD (n=1,499)
Prenatal care initiation
 Second/third vs first (ref) (n=6,111,228) ref 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) 0.91 (0.88, 0.94) 1.11 (1.02, 1.21) 0.85 (0.73, 0.99) 1.21 (1.09, 1.33)
Number of visits
 Few/none (0–10) vs recommended (11–14, ref) (n=4,589,666)b ref 1.02 (1.00, 1.03) 1.00 (0.99, 1.02) 1.12 (1.07, 1.17) 1.08 (1.01, 1.16) 1.08 (1.01, 1.15)
 Excess (≥15) vs recommended (ref) (n=4,009,424)c ref 1.13 (1.11, 1.15) 1.14 (1.12, 1.16) 0.98 (0.91, 1.05) 1.01 (0.92, 1.12) 1.23 (1.14, 1.32)

Notes: Boldface indicates statistical significance at p<0.05.

a

Adjusted for race, education, insurance, age, parity, gestational hypertension/preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, mental health diagnosis, and year. Number of visits also adjusted for gestational age.

b

Women with ≥15 visits were not included in this analysis.

c

Women with 0–10 visits were not included in this analysis.

IDD, intellectual and developmental disabilities.