Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;45(2):330–338. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby040

Table 3.

Cross-sectional Associations Between Metabolic Markers and PEs at Age 18

Predictor OR (95% CI) for Psychotic Outcomes
Unadjusted Model Adjusted for Sex, Ethnicity, Social Class, BMIa and Smoking, Gestational Age, Birthweight
Definite PEs n OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
IR 2627 2.41(1.50–4.40) <.001* 2.32 (1.37–3.97) <.001*
HOMA2 2627 1.34 (1.17–3.18) .019* 1.19 (1.01–1.43) .034*
HOMA2 × HOMA2 2627 1.23 (1.06–3.09) .008* 1.08 (1.01–1.15) .021*
FPG 2627 0.89 (0.72–6.56) .670 0.96 (0.13–7.28) .966
FPG × FPG 2627 0.92 (0.82–1.06) .762 0.99 (0.82–1.19) .904
Fasting insulin 2627 1.36 (1.02–1.78) .019* 1.23 (1.03–1.47) .023*
Fasting insulin × fasting insulin 2627 1.07 (0.99–1.78) .201 1.02 (0.95–1.10) .526
Metabolic syndrome 2627 1.62 (0.77–3.39) .204 1.68 (0.71–3.97) .244

Note: BMI, body mass index; HOMA2, Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance; IR, insulin resistance; PEs, psychotic experiences. IR as categorical variable defined as HOMA2 >1.79. HOMA2, FPG, and Fasting Insulin presented as continuous variables.

aNot adjusted for in Metabolic Syndrome analysis.

*P < .05.