Table 4.
Relation of fNIRS and cortical excitability as measured by TMS: motor mapping, functional MEPs, and central fatigue.
References | Population | Task | Stimulation Parameters | Stimulation Area | Measurement Area | No. of Subjects | Finding | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Motor Mapping | Park et al., 2004 | Stroke-Paresis | Key Turning | 110%RMT for Motor Mapping | L/R-M1 | Bilateral-M1 | Case Study (Stroke) | Decreased [HbO], increased lateralization during task over therapy. Enlarged motor region after therapy. |
Akiyama et al., 2006 | Healthy | Hand Grasping | 120%RMT for Motor Mapping | L-M1 | L-M1 | 10 HC | Biphasic [HbO] changes observed over MEP COG | |
Koenraadt et al., 2011 | Healthy | Thumb abduction | 120%RMT for Motor Mapping | L-M1 | L-M1 | 11 HC | No difference in [HbO] changes at MEP COG vs C3 | |
MEP during Task | Lo et al., 2009 | Healthy | Reading aloud, Singing | 110%RMT, random MEP evaluation during task | L-M1 | L-M1 | 5 HC | Changes in evoked MEP amplitude during vocalization at MEP COG, MEP changes not correlated with [HbO] |
Derosière et al., 2015 | Healthy | Sustained Attention | MEP evaluated at 5min intervals | L-M1 | PFC, L-M1, R-Parietal | 15 TMS, 13 fNIRS, 4 Control | Increase in lateral PFC and right parietal [HbO], MEP amplitude increase over TOT | |
Corp et al., 2018 | Elderly | Dual Task [Tapping, N-Back] | MEP evaluated at 12.5s intervals | L-M1 | Exp1: PFC (Online), Exp2: PFC, PM, M1 |
Exp1: 15 Young, 15 Eld. Exp2: 15 Eld. |
Increased CSP during dual-tasks in elderly correlated with worse performance. fNIRS uncorrelated with dual-task performance | |
Exercise & Fatigue | Millet et al., 2012 | Healthy | Isometric elbow contraction | MEP and CSP evaluation every 4th contraction | R-M1 | L-DLPFC | Exp1: 12 HC, Exp2: 10 HC |
Reduced performance and prefrontal oxygenation in hypoxia despite normoxia in muscle. Similar CSP and MEP responses |
Goodall et al., 2012 | Healthy | Cycling | MEP, CSP, VA evaluation at 130%RMT before and after exercise | L-M1 | L-DLPFC | 9 HC | Reduced performance and prefrontal oxygenation in hypoxia and larger decrease in VA TMS after exercise | |
Goodall et al., 2014 | Healthy | Cycling | MEP, CSP, VA evaluation at 130%RMT before and after exercise | L-M1 | L-DLPFC | 7 HC | Greater decrease in prefrontal oxygenation in acute hypoxia, decrease in voluntary and potentiated force in both chronic and acute hypoxia. Doubled MEP size in chronic hypoxia. | |
Rupp et al., 2015 | Healthy | Isometric knee contraction | MEP, VA, CSP evaluated before and during contractions | L-M1 | L-DLPFC | 15 HC | Reduced performance in hypoxia, increased prefrontal oxygenation in hypoxia with CO2 clamping vs. w/o, VA TMS decrease greater in hypoxia w/o CO2 clamping | |
Jubeau et al., 2017 | Healthy | Cycling | MEP, VA, CSP evaluated before and 1,2,3 hours after exercise | L-M1 | L-DLPFC, L-M1 | 10 HC | No performance difference, VA TMS or CSP after prolonged exercise in hypoxia conditions, reduced prefrontal oxygenation in hypoxia | |
Marillier et al., 2017 | Healthy | Isometric elbow contraction | MEP, VA, CSP evaluated before and during contractions | L-M1 | L-DLPFC | 11 HC | No performance differences between acute, chronic, or normoxia conditions or in VA TMS decline. Longer CSP in hypoxia conditions. No difference in prefrontal or muscle oxygenation |
|
Laurent et al., 2018 | Healthy | Isometric knee extension | MEP, VA evaluated at 140% 'optimal' power, before and during extension, and after task failure | L-M1 | L-DLPFC | 14 Trained Athletes | No effect of salbutamol intake on VA TMS, prefrontal oxygenation, or task performance | |
Solianik et al., 2018 | Healthy | 2 Hr Speed-Accuracy Motor task | MEP evaluation at 130%RMT before and after task | L-M1 | DLPFC | 10 HC | Increased MEP amplitude after prolonged activity, decrease in evoked left-prefrontal [Hb] in Stroop task vs. pre-task Stroop, no change for control activity |