Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 6;9:109. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0445-2

Fig. 4. Higher sensitivity to devaluation by satiation in the 1 h-Ø session after devaluation training.

Fig. 4

a Percent volume of water self-delivered (±SEM) during 1 h-Ø(1), baseline, and 1 h-Ø(2) sessions. *Different from 1 h-Ø(2) (p < 0.0001). b Mean percent of cocaine choices during 1 h-Ø(1), deprivation, and 1 h-Ø(2) sessions. The horizontal dashed line at 50% indicates the indifference level. *Different from 1 h-Ø(2) (p < 0.0001). #Different from indifference (p < 0.0001). c Mean water sampling and choice latency (±SEM) during 1 h-Ø(1), baseline, and 1 h-Ø(2) sessions. *Different from 1 h-Ø(2) (p < 0.01). d Mean water sampling latency (±SEM) in the first and second trials of baseline and 1h-Ø(2) sessions. *Different from baseline (p < 0.001)