Table 5.
Pairwise comparison of strain AT3 with other species using GGDC, formula 2 (DDH estimates based on identities/HSP length)a
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 100 | 26.0% ± 2.4 | 26.4% ± 2.4 | 27.1% ± 2.4 | 21.5% ± 2.4 | 22.1% ± 2.4 | 22.6% ± 2.4 | 33.7% ± 2.4 |
| 2 | 100 | 27.3% ± 2.4 | 24.8% ± 2.4 | 21.1% ± 2.4 | 20.6% ± 2.4 | 36.0% ± 2.5 | 35.9% ± 2.4 | |
| 3 | 100 | 32.6% ± 2.45 | 34.3% ± 2.5 | 19.4% ± 2.4 | 28.0% ± 2.5 | 35.5% ± 2.5 | ||
| 4 | 100 | 19.1% ± 2.3 | 27.1% ± 2.4 | 27.7% ± 2.5 | 34.1% ± 2.5 | |||
| 5 | 100 | 22.0% ± 2.4 | 34.5% ± 2.5 | 22.0% ± 2.4 | ||||
| 6 | 100 | 34.1% ± 2.5 | 33.7% ± 2.5 | |||||
| 7 | 100 | 21.1% ± 2.4 | ||||||
| 8 | 100 |
DDH, DNA-DNA hybridization; GGDC, Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator; HSP, high-scoring segment pairs; rRNA, ribosomal RNA.
1, Strain AT3; 2, Anaerotruncus colihominis; 3, Hydrogenoanaerobacterium saccharovorans; 4, Ruthenibacterium lactatiformans; 5, Acutalibacter muris; 6, Acetanaerobacterium elongatum; 7, Ruminococcus flavefaciens; 8, Ruminococcus champanellensis.
a
Confidence intervals indicate inherent uncertainty in estimating DDH values from intergenomic distances based on models derived from empirical test data sets. These results are consistent with 16S rRNA and phylogenomic analyses as well as GGDC results.