Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;7(21):e009561. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009561

Table 3.

Meta‐Analyzed HRs and 95% CIs of Incident Dementia in OAC Comparison Cohorts: MarketScan and Optum, 2010–2015

Variable Warfarin Dabigatran Warfarin Rivaroxaban Warfarin Apixaban
N 46 483 46 483 61 641 61 641 31 089 31 089
Dementia, N 739 724 944 648 474 277
Follow‐up, mean, y 1.7 1.9 1.4 1.2 1.2 0.8
Incidence rate (per 1000 person‐years) 9.2 8.0 10.5 8.7 12.9 11.0
HRs (95% CIs)
Model 1a 1 0.85 (0.74–0.97) 1 0.85 (0.77–0.94) 1 0.80 (0.63–1.03)
Model 2b 1 0.85 (0.71–1.01) 1 0.85 (0.76–0.94) 1 0.80 (0.65–0.97)
Rivaroxaban Dabigatran Apixaban Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban
N 28 235 28 235 11 882 11 882 31 143 31 143
Dementia, N 290 399 87 119 360 279
Follow‐up, mean, y 1.2 1.7 0.8 1.3 1.1 0.8
Incidence rate (per 1000 person‐years) 8.5 8.2 8.8 7.3 10.6 11.0
HRs (95% CIs)
Model 1a 1 1.03 (0.85–1.24) 1 0.95 (0.65–1.38) 1 0.99 (0.85–1.16)
Model 2b 1 1.02 (0.79–1.32) 1 0.92 (0.63–1.36) 1 1.01 (0.86–1.19)

CI indicates confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OAC, oral anticoagulant.

a

Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, and prevalent cognitive impairment in the study from MarketScan and for age, sex, race, education level, household income level, and prevalent cognitive impairment in the study from Optum.

b

Model 2 was additionally adjusted for comorbidities, medications, and CHA2DS2‐VASc and HAS‐BLED scores.