Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 25;15:542–550. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.15.48

Table 1.

Catalyst screening and optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-15-542-i001.jpg

Entry Conditions Solvent Yieldb (%)

1 no catalyst DCM NR
2 [Rh(CH2CH2)2Cl]2 DCM ND
3 [Rh(Cp*)Cl2]2 DCM 72
4 Rh2(OAc)4 DCM 45
5 Rh2(TFA)4 DCM 52
6 Rh2(esp)2 DCM 68
7 Rh2(cap)4 DCM 40
8 Rh2(5S,R-MenPY)4 DCM 61
9c Rh2(esp)2 DCM 39
10c [Rh(Cp*)Cl2]2 DCM 44
11c Rh2(5S,R-MenPY)4 DCM 58
12c Rh2(5S,R-MenPY)4 DCE 67
13c Rh2(5S,R-MenPY)4 hexane 59
14c Rh2(5S,R-MenPY)4 toluene 59
15c Rh2(5S,R-MenPY)4 DME 60
16c Rh2(5S,R-MenPY)4 DMF 33

aReaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol, 0.2 M in degassed solvent), 2a (2.5 mmol), catalyst (1 mol %) under argon at room temperature for 24 h unless otherwise noted. bIsolated yield. c0.1 mol % of catalyst. esp = α,α,α’,α’-tetramethyl-1,3-benzenedipropionate, cap = caprolactamate, 5S,R-MenPY = (S)-(1R,2S,5R)-2-isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl 2-oxopyrrolidine-5-carboxylate, NR = no reaction, ND = not detected.