Safavi 2014.
| Study characteristics | |||
| Patient sampling | Consecutive ASA I‐III adult patients | ||
| Patient characteristics and setting | "These patients were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation" Sample size: 476 150 females Mean age: 36.6 years |
||
| Index tests | MMT, ULBT, combination of tests | ||
| Target condition and reference standard(s) | Difficult laryngoscopy: Cormack and Lehane | ||
| Flow and timing | Not described | ||
| Comparative | |||
| Notes | |||
| Methodological quality | |||
| Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
| DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
| Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | |||
| Was a case‐control design avoided? | |||
| Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | |||
| DOMAIN 2: Index Test All Tests | |||
| Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | |||
| If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | |||
| Did the assessors of the index test have appropriate training? | |||
| Was interobserver variability reported for some or all patients? | |||
| Was interobserver agreement acceptable? | |||
| DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
| Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | |||
| Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | |||
| DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
| Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | |||
| Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | |||
| Were all patients included in the analysis? | |||