Baig 2014.
| Study characteristics | |||
| Patient sampling | Patients having ASA II status, age above 18 years and known cases of diabetes mellitus planned for elective surgeries requiring general anaesthesia | ||
| Patient characteristics and setting | Those who already had airway deformity due to surgical or medical problem or those undergoing rapid sequence induction were excluded Sample size: 357 145 females Mean age: 53.7 years |
||
| Index tests | MMT, combination of tests | ||
| Target condition and reference standard(s) | Difficult laryngoscopy: Cormack and Lehane | ||
| Flow and timing | Preoperatively | ||
| Comparative | |||
| Notes | |||
| Methodological quality | |||
| Item | Authors' judgement | Risk of bias | Applicability concerns |
| DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection | |||
| Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? | |||
| Was a case‐control design avoided? | |||
| Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? | |||
| DOMAIN 2: Index Test All Tests | |||
| Were the index test results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the reference standard? | |||
| If a threshold was used, was it pre‐specified? | |||
| Did the assessors of the index test have appropriate training? | |||
| Was interobserver variability reported for some or all patients? | |||
| Was interobserver agreement acceptable? | |||
| DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard | |||
| Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? | |||
| Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? | |||
| DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing | |||
| Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? | |||
| Did all patients receive the same reference standard? | |||
| Were all patients included in the analysis? | |||