Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;7(19):e010203. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010203

Table 2.

Risk‐Adjusted Relative Probabilities of Black vs White Patients Receiving Various Therapies for NSTEMI: ARIC Community Surveillance Study, 2000–2014

NSTEMI Therapies 2000–2004 2005–2009 2010–2014 Trenda
RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI) RR (95% CI) P Value
Medical management
Aspirin 0.93 (0.90–0.99) 0.96 (0.92–1.02) 0.96 (0.92–1.02) 0.7
Nonaspirin antiplatelet 0.76 (0.69–0.86) 0.78 (0.71–0.86) 0.75 (0.68–0.84) 0.3
β‐Blocker 0.99 (0.93–1.09) 0.97 (0.93–1.04) 0.96 (0.93–1.02) 0.9
Lipid‐lowering agent 0.80 (0.75–0.88) 0.99 (0.91–1.10) 0.92 (0.86–0.99) 0.4
Invasive management
Angiography 0.75 (0.70–0.83) 0.76 (0.69–0.84) 0.67 (0.61–0.74) 0.8
Revascularization 0.60 (0.53–0.680 0.55 (0.48–0.64) 0.52 (0.46–0.60) 0.7

Models adjusted for demographics [age, sex, hospital geographic location (Forsyth County, NC; Jackson, MS; Minneapolis, MN; Washington County, MD) and year of admission] and comorbidities and clinical course (diabetes mellitus, acute heart failure/pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock, and ventricular fibrillation/cardiac arrest). ARIC indicates Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities; CI, confidence interval; NSTEMI, non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction; RR, relative risk.

a

Annual trends derived from aggregate risk‐adjusted model (2000–2014), testing the multiplicative interaction between race and calendar year of admission.