Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 30;13(1):011301. doi: 10.1063/1.5083913

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Comparison of the theoretical result from an asymptotic theory for the zero cone angle limit to computed results from the full Poisson-Boltzmann equation. The theoretical and computed cross-section averaged total ion concentration distribution c, normalized by the bulk concentration c0, is plotted against the radial coordinate from the (imaginary) cone tip normalized by the pore length L. The concentration distribution is observed to be very different for opposite polarization at FV/RgT=10 and for weakly and strongly selective nanopores, as defined by a dimensionless parameter X (see Ref. 126): the ratio of the surface charge concentration divided by the pore radius, to c0. The total concentration for Donnan equilibrium (green dashes), namely, when V = 0, is also given for comparison. The computation is done by solving both 1D (open symbol) and 2D (closed symbol) Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations. Enrichment occurs when applying a voltage from tip to base (positive V0, red, lines, and up-triangles) and depletion with reverse bias (blue, lines, and circles). The tip radius, base radius, length, and surface charge density of nanopore are fixed at 5 nm, 30 nm, 1 μm, and 0.05 C/m2, respectively. The size of the reservoirs for 2D is 500 nm × 500 nm. A symmetric electrolyte KCl with the diffusion coefficient of 2 ×109 m2/s is used. (a) Weakly selective, the concentration is 1000 mM (Xtip = 0.21). (b) Strongly selective, the concentration is 15 mM (Xtip = 13.8). Adapted with permission from Yan et al., J. Chem. Phys. 138, 044706 (2013). Copyright 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.