Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 29;3(1):20180106. doi: 10.1515/pp-2018-0106

Table 1:

Summary of studies included.

Author Year Type FIGO
stage
N pat N PDS N CR CR/
PDS
(%)
N futile lap Futile lap/patients Cut-off for futile laparotomy
1 Rutten 2017 Randomized controlled trial IIb and higher *102 63 53 84% 10 10 % Tumour > 1 cm
2 Petrillo 2015 Retrospective AOC 234 234 189 81 % 45 19 % Tumour > 1 cm
3 Fagotti 2005 Prospective AOC (18 % I-II) 95 64 38 59 % 26 27 % Tumour > 1 cm
4 Fagotti 2008 Prospective AOC 113 113 56 50 % 57 50 % Tumour > 1 cm
5 Brun 2008 Retrospective AOC 55 26 18 69 % 8 15 % Tumour > 1 cm
6 Brun 2009 Same population as Brun 2008
7 Vergote 1998 Retrospective AOC 77 28 21 75 % 7 9 % Tumour > 0.5 cm
8 Angioli 2005 Not reported IIIc/IV 87 53 51 96 % 2 2 % No tumour visible
9 Deffieux 2006 Not reported IIIc/IV 15 11 10 91 % 1 7 % Tumour > 1 cm
778 592 (76 % patients) 436 (56 % PDS) 50 to 91 % 156 (20 % patients) 2 to 50 %

Legend: AOC: Advanced ovarian cancer; LS: laparoscopic staging; PDS: Primary debulking surgery; CR: complete cytoreduction; *: LS group only; 39 % futile laparotomy after conventional staging, 10 % after LS, RR 0.25 (95 % CI: 0.13–0.47, p<0.001); in Fagotti 2004 CR status remained undefined in 13 patients; †: N/A: not available; TP: true positive; FP: false positive; FN: false negative; TN: true negative.