Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0213096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213096

Table 5. Comparison of the ratios of circulating RAS peptides in ARDS at study entry.

*Ratio: Precursor→Product Median Ratio (interquartile Range)
Non-survivors Survivors P-value
A(1–12)→A(1–10) 60.0 (2.05–315.99) 4.05 (0.89–29.93) <0.001
A(1–10)→A(1–9) 0.08 (0.04–0.27) 1.00 (0.51–2.05) <0.001
A(1–10)→A(1–8) 0.06 (0.01-.11) 0.74 (0.39–1.09) <0.001
A(1–9)→A(1–7) 0.27 (0.04–1.09) 0.4 (0.09–0.64) 0.692
A(1–10)→A(1–7) 0.03 (0.01–0.08) 0.48 (0.14–0.97) <0.001
A(1–8)→A(1–7) 0.63 (0.24–1.82) 0.85 (0.46–1.07) 0.655
A(1–8)→A(2–8) 5.8 (0.77–16) 1.54 (0.55–4.93) 0.093
A(1–7)→A(1–5) 1.00 (0.27–2.6) 0.29 (0.08–2.44) 0.070
A(1–7)→aA(1–7) 1.18 (0.37–9.12) 2.12 (0.91–4.85) 0.206
A(2–8)→A(3–8) 0.26 (0.10–0.93) 0.63 (0.14–1.00) 0.438

These ratios of product to precursor provide insights into the metabolic levels of the catalyzing enzymes. Ratios significantly different between survivor and non-survivor groups were A(1–12) A(1–10), A(1–10) A(1–9), A(1–10) A(1–8) and A(1–10) A(1–7) (p <0.001)

*Ratio is calculated as product concentration/precursor concentration.