Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 3;433(1):147–156. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3825-0

Table 1.

Results of the statistical analyses both as a one-way analysis with inoculum treatment as a fixed factor and as a regression analysis per replacement series. Values in bold are significant (p < 0.05). B = the direction of the relationship, e.g. H > A indicates that biomass is higher with a higher proportion of heathland material in the inoculum relative to arable soil. Relationships significant at p < 0.1 are shown in brackets

1-way LMM Regression analysis (per replacement series)
Treatment Arable-Grassland Arable-Heathland Grassland-Heathland
Response d.f. F p value d.f. F p value B d.f. F p value B d.f. F p value B
A. montana 14, 163 3.21 0.0002 1,56 0.53 0.47 1,56 4.64 0.036 H > A 1,56 10.06 0.0025 H > G
C. rotundifolia* 14, 163 3.18 0.0002 1,56 0.20 0.65 1,56 3.11 0.083 (H > A) 1,56 1.72 0.20
F. filiformis 14, 163 1.99 0.0214 1,56 0.04 0.85 1,56 3.31 0.074 (H > A) 1,56 6.49 0.014 H > G
C. capillaris 14, 163 2.26 0.008 1,56 <0.01 0.95 1,56 5.16 0.027 H > A 1,56 2.77 0.10
M. arvensis 14, 163 18.09 <0.0001 1,56 9.54 0.0031 A > G 1,56 15.93 0.0002 A > H 1,56 32.63 <0.0001 G > H
L. perenne 14, 163 0.69 0.78 1,56 0.10 0.75 1,56 1.43 0.24 1,56 <0.01 0.99
Target biomass 14, 163 4.11 <0.0001 1,56 0.05 0.82 1,56 3.83 0.055 (H > A) 1,56 8.66 0.0047 H > G
Ruderal biomass 14, 163 2.78 0.001 1,56 8.52 0.005 A > G 1,56 0.21 0.65 1,56 8.05 0.0063 G > H
Total biomass 14, 163 2.78 0.001 1,56 8.73 0.0046 A > G 1,56 <0.01 0.98 1,56 4.45 0.039 G > H

*Log-transformed