Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;9:1894. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01894

Table 4.

Microfibril angle from different sources of cellulose obtained through the use of different characterization techniques.

Source of cellulose Microfibril angle (o) Techniques
Picea abies ≤5 (earlywood), 20 (latewood) SAXS (Jakob et al., 1994)
8 (earlywood), 9 (latewood) XRD (Sahlberg et al., 1997)
Picea excelsa 32—35 (normal wood) XRD (Kantola and Seitsonen, 1961)
39—43 (compression wood)
18 (normal wood) SAXS (Kantola and Kähkönen, 1963)
25—45 (compression wood)
Cedar (branch) 39—57 PLM (Preston, 1934)
Japanese larch 37—79 PLM (Preston, 1934)
Abies nobilis 23—69 PLM (Preston, 1934)
Virginia pine 20 PLM (Mark, 1967)
Loblolly pine 4—25 (latewood) SM (Hiller, 1964)
19.22—34.06 NIR (Jones et al., 2005)
Slash pine 10—40 (latewood) SM (Hiller, 1964)
Douglas fir 20 (early &and normal wood) XRD (El-osta et al., 1973)
7—30 PLM (Erickson and Arima, 1974)
Pinus radiata 10.7—41.6 NIR (Schimleck et al., 2002)
12—27 PLM (Boyd and Foster, 1974)

PLM:, polarized light microscopy; SM:, staining methods; NIR:, near IR spectroscopy; XRD:, X-ray diffraction; SAXS:, small angle X-ray scattering.