Table 2.
Frequency count, percentage and cumulative percent frequency of the frequently used individual measures tapping into adolescents' EF.
| Measure | Frequency count | %Frequency | Cumulative %frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original Continuous Performance Test (CPT)* | 58 | 2.49 | 2.49 |
| Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test (ROCFT) | 62 | 2.66 | 5.15 |
| D-KEFS Color-Word Interference Test (CWIT) | 62 | 2.66 | 7.82 |
| Classical Stroop task | 63 | 2.71 | 10.52 |
| Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT) | 78 | 3.35 | 13.87 |
| Verbal fluency tasks | 88 | 3.78 | 17.65 |
| Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) | 140 | 6.01 | 23.67 |
| Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) | 148 | 6.36 | 30.03 |
| Trail Making Tests (TMT; Part- A and/or B) | 158 | 6.79 | 36.81 |
| Digit Span (forward and/or backward) | 160 | 6.87 | 43.69 |
| Other measures of EF# | 1311 | 56.31 | 100.00 |
| Total | 2328 | 100.00 |
D-KEFS, Delis–Kaplan Executive Functions System (D-KEFS).
The role of attention in EF has been widely debated in the literature. We include Continuous Performance Test as
a measure of EF because this is how it was classed by authors.
Summed frequency counts of 328 individual measures of EF each with a frequency usage < 2.5%. Only 12 of these were rating scales with Dysexecutive (DEX) questionnaire, Diabetes Related Executive Functioning Scale (DREFS), Decision-Making Quality Scale (count = 2 each) as the most outstanding. The rest of the measures were performance-based, Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT, count = 51) the most outstanding.