Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 1;10:311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00311

Table 2.

Frequency count, percentage and cumulative percent frequency of the frequently used individual measures tapping into adolescents' EF.

Measure Frequency count %Frequency Cumulative %frequency
Original Continuous Performance Test (CPT)* 58 2.49 2.49
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test (ROCFT) 62 2.66 5.15
D-KEFS Color-Word Interference Test (CWIT) 62 2.66 7.82
Classical Stroop task 63 2.71 10.52
Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT) 78 3.35 13.87
Verbal fluency tasks 88 3.78 17.65
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) 140 6.01 23.67
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) 148 6.36 30.03
Trail Making Tests (TMT; Part- A and/or B) 158 6.79 36.81
Digit Span (forward and/or backward) 160 6.87 43.69
Other measures of EF# 1311 56.31 100.00
Total 2328 100.00

D-KEFS, Delis–Kaplan Executive Functions System (D-KEFS).

*

The role of attention in EF has been widely debated in the literature. We include Continuous Performance Test as

a measure of EF because this is how it was classed by authors.

#

Summed frequency counts of 328 individual measures of EF each with a frequency usage < 2.5%. Only 12 of these were rating scales with Dysexecutive (DEX) questionnaire, Diabetes Related Executive Functioning Scale (DREFS), Decision-Making Quality Scale (count = 2 each) as the most outstanding. The rest of the measures were performance-based, Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT, count = 51) the most outstanding.