Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 28;8(1):e010959. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010959

Table 1.

OAC Treatment of AF Detected Before the Study Versus During the Study

Patients With AF (Aged ≥65 y) Class 1 OAC Recommendation Group CHA2DS2‐VASc, Mean Age, Mean, y Male Sex, %
Total, No. Class 1 OAC Recommendation, No. (%)* Prescribed OAC, No. (%) Prescribed Antiplatelet Only, No. (%) No Therapy, No. (%)
AF diagnosed before study 1346 1306 (97) 933 (71) 213 (16) 160 (12) 3.9 80.0 53
AF diagnosed during study 66 64 (97) 54 (85) 3 (5) 7 (11) 3.8
Screen‐detected AF 19 18 (95) 15 (83) 1 (6) 2 (11) 3.8 78.6 53
Otherwise‐detected AF 47 46 (98) 39 (85) 2 (4) 5 (11) 3.8 79.6 45

AF indicates atrial fibrillation; CHA2DS2‐VASc: C, congestive heart failure/left ventricular dysfunction; H, high blood pressure; A2, age older than 75 years; D, diabetes mellitus; S2, stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism; V, vascular disease (coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, aortic plaque); A, age 65 to 74 years; Sc, sex category female.

*

Oral anticoagulant (OAC) recommendations as per European Society of Cardiology 2016 guidelines.12

Between‐group difference (P<0.001).