Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 7;9:3801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40443-7

Table 1.

Deduced strong binding sites in vRNA5 of isoenergetic microarray probes.

Binding sitea,b Deduced binding sitesc Probe sequenced Strength of probe bindinge Predicted ΔG°37 of probe/ vRNA5 duplex (kcal/mol) for confirmed binding sitesf RNase H cleavage sites
22/184/355/880/883/1251/1280/1300/1429 883
1251
1429
dDgDdg S −9.24
(883, 1251, 1429)
880–882 (w)
883 (s)
1250–1253 (w) 1254–1260 (s) 1261 (w)
1421–1427 (s)
1428 (w)
256/457/469/546/814/1181 469 dDgDgg S −10.03 (469) 470–484 (s,w)
677 677 DcGgDg S −10.81 (677) 676–684 (s)
275/642/644/790/860/1073/1203/1221/1328/1330 1073
1330
dGdGdg S −10.71 (1073)
−12.84 (1330)
1067–1071 (s) 1073 (s)
1331–1332 (s)
1334 (s)
534/683 683 gUgUgg S −9.77 (683) 676–684 (s)
377/415/562/646/722/862/1205/1450 646 uGdGdg S −12.22 (646) 647 (s)
649–650 (s)

aPossible complementary binding sites of probes, bsites are denoted by the middle nucleotide of the complementary RNA region; cdeduced binding site for probe by comparison with DNA induced RNase H cleavage results; dnucleotides in capital letter (G, U, D) are 2′-O-methyl-RNA nucleotides, lower case letters (c, g, u, d) are LNA nucleotides, D and d are 2,6 – diaminopurine (2′-O-methyl type or LNA, respectively); ebinding was considered strong (S) when the integrated intensities were ≥1/3 of the strongest intensity. Hybridization condition: buffer 1, 37 °C; fΔG°37 calculated as modified probe/RNA duplex67,68, in parenthesis, the site of binding for which calculation was done; g(s) – strong RNase H cleavage, (w) – weak RNase H cleavage.