Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 5;8(2):189. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020189

Table 2.

Meta-regression results for enrolment.

Subgroup n Odds Ratio (95% CI) p Residual I2 *
Delivery format
(any face-to-face or no face-to-face)
3096 0.73 (0.57 to 0.93) 0.01 37%
Theory-based
(yes or no)
3096 0.98 (0.75 to 1.27) 0.86 60%
Outcome ascertainment
(self-report or chart-report)
1835 0.99 (0.99 to 1.00) 0.74 53%
Number of sites
(multi-site or single-centre)
943 0.90 (0.69 to 1.17) 0.40 60%
Region
(North America or other)
3096 0.91 (0.70 to 1.17) 0.44 60%
Intervention Intensity
(<5 contacts or ≥5 contacts)
2659 0.99 (0.99 to 1.00) 0.23 66%
Peer navigation
(yes or no)
3096 0.74 (0.50 to 1.10) 0.13 55%
Intervention deliverer
(nurse or allied health care professional or no one)
3096 0.73 (0.56 to 0.94) 0.02 37%
Intervention target
(patient or other)
3096 1.49 (0.98 to 2.28) 0.06 46%
Cardiac indication
(heart failure included or not)
2196 0.83 (0.63 to 1.10) 0.19 55%
CR setting
(supervised or unsupervised)
1650 1.03 (0.84 to 1.25) 0.76 15%

* I2 statistic represents the percentage of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity. CI—confidence interval; CR—cardiac rehabilitation.