Table 3.
Ordered logistic regression model analysis for the volume of alcohol intake amongst Chinese male drinkers, CHNS.
| Volume of Alcohol Intake 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survey Year | 2004 | 2006 | 2009 | 2011 | |
| Parameter | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
| Intercept1 | 5.56 (3.60–8.57) | 5.98 (3.75–9.53) | 13.41 (8.38–21.46) | 9.44 (5.91–15.07) | |
| Intercept2 | 12.77 (8.22–19.81) | 13.85 (8.65–22.20) | 33.45 (20.74–54.00) | 24.88 (15.49–39.96) | |
| Intercept3 | 42.18 (26.84–66.29) | 42.78 (26.39–69.27) | 110.61 (67.56–180.91) | 88.15 (54.16–143.31) | |
| Age | — | 1.02 (1.02–2.06) | 1.02 (1.01–2.05) | 1.02 (1.02–2.06) | 1.02 (1.01–2.04) |
| Residence | Rural | 1.22 (1.03–1.44) | 1.21 (1.02–1.42) | 1.13 (0.96–1.33) | 1.51 (1.31–1.75) |
| Urban (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Marital status | Other | 1.35 (0.85–2.16) | 1.35 (0.80–2.27) | 1.18 (0.70–1.99) | 2.02 (1.26–3.25) |
| Married | 1.46 (1.08–1.98) | 1.80 (1.25–2.59) | 1.68 (1.15–2.45) | 1.71 (1.17–2.50) | |
| Single (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Highest education levels | UA 4 | 0.61 (0.43–0.88) | 0.88 (0.64–1.19) | 1.17 (0.86–1.58) | 0.99 (0.80–1.23) |
| SPSG 3 | 1.04 (0.87–1.25) | 0.96 (0.80–1.15) | 0.86 (0.71–1.03) | 0.80 (0.68–0.94) | |
| PSB 2 (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Working status | Yes | 1.14 (0.94–1.37) | 1.29 (1.07–1.56) | 1.76 (1.45–2.14) | 1.35 (1.13–1.61) |
| No (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| Tobacco consumption | Yes | 1.73 (1.45–2.05) | 1.59 (1.34–1.89) | 1.85 (1.56–2.19) | 1.63 (1.40–1.90) |
| No (ref) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
1 Four level variables: ≤ 84 g/w, 84.01–168 g/w, 168.01–336 g/w, ≥ 336.01 g/w. 2 Unfinished primary school and below; 3 Secondary and primary school graduates; 4 University or above.