Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 25;16(4):665. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16040665

Table 3.

The likelihood chi-squared tests.

Model Comparison Δ-2ll df p-Value
1-Rural vs. 0-Rural −743.74 18 <0.01
1-Urban vs. 0-Urban −1128.29 18 <0.01
2a-Rural vs. 1-Rural −36.3 2 <0.01
2a-Urban vs. 1-Urban −26.17 2 <0.01
2b-Rural vs. 1-Rural −1.15 2 >0.10
2b-Urban vs. 1-Urban −14.94 2 <0.01
2c-Rural vs. 1-Rural −15.41 2 <0.01
2c-Urban vs. 1-Urban −18.75 2 <0.01
2d-Rural vs. 1-Rural −13.91 2 <0.01
2d-Urban vs. 1-Urban −27.22 2 <0.01
2e-Rural vs. 1-Rural −17.35 2 <0.01
2e-Urban vs. 1-Urban −8.64 2 <0.05

Δ-2ll = The –2ll value of the first model minus the –2ll value of the second model.