Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 22;8(2):268. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020268

Table A2.

Pooled risk ratios in the main and sensitivity analyses.

Stratification Approaches CNS Effect Sleep Related Effect
All included studies Inverse variance with 0.5 continuity correction (main analysis) 1.16 (0.64–2.12) 1.67 (0.91–3.07)
Inverse variance with “treatment-arm” continuity correction 1.14 (0.61–2.11) 1.35 (0.84–2.17)
Mantel-Haenszel 1.15 (0.62–2.15) 1.35 (0.84–2.17)
Beta-binomial with correlated responses 0.45 (0.14–1.53) 1.96 (0.46–8.43)
Studies with comparison group of corticosteroids Inverse variance with 0.5 continuity correction 0.27 (0.02–3.00)
Inverse variance with “treatment-arm” continuity correction 0.27 (0.03–2.81)
Mantel-Haenszel 0.27 (0.02–4.49)
Beta-binomial with correlated responses 0.05 (0.003–1.10)
Studies with comparison group of placebo Inverse variance with 0.5 continuity correction 1.35 (0.83–2.11) 1.55 (0.82–2.92)
Inverse variance with “treatment-arm” continuity correction 1.35 (0.83–2.11) 1.55 (0.82–2.92)
Mantel-Haenszel 1.35 (0.83–2.11) 1.55 (0.82–2.92)
Beta-binomial with correlated responses 1.40 (0.6–3.30) 1.44 (0.43–4.84)
Studies with comparison group of non-corticosteroids Inverse variance with 0.5 continuity correction 1.40 (0.86–2.27) 1.63 (0.88–3.03)
Inverse variance with “treatment-arm” continuity correction 1.40 (0.86–2.27) 1.63 (0.88–3.03)
Mantel-Haenszel 1.40 (0.86–2.27) 1.63 (0.88–3.03)
Beta-binomial with correlated responses 1.70 (0.60–5.16) 1.77 (0.56–5.55)