Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 15;11(2):225. doi: 10.3390/cancers11020225

Table 3.

PPGL cohorts stratified by the GAPP algorithm.

Study No. First Author (Year Published) Number of PCCs Number of Malignant PCCs * Definition of Malignant PCCs * Mal PCCs GAPP ≥ 3 Mal PCCs GAPP < 3 Benign PCCs GAPP ≥ 3 Benign PCCs GAPP < 3 SENS SPEC PPV NPV
A. PCC cohorts stratified by the GAPP algorithm.
1 Kimura (2014) 126 24 MET npd npd 0 102 npd npd npd npd
2 Koh (2017) 32 4 MET 2 2 19 9 50% 32% 10% 82%
3 Stenman (2018) 41 0 REC/MET 0 0 16 25 npd 61% npd npd
Summarized - 199 28 - 2 2 35 136 50% 80% 5% 99%
B. PGL cohorts stratified by the GAPP algorithm.
1 Kimura (2014) 36 16 MET npd npd 0 20 npd npd npd npd
2 Gupta (2016) 10 4 MET 4 0 6 0 100% 0% 40% npd
3 Koh (2017) 5 0 MET 0 0 4 1 npd 20% npd npd
Summarized - 51 20 - 4 0 10 21 100% 68% 29% 100%

PCC—pheochromocytoma, PGL—paraganglioma, MET—metastatic disease, REC—recurrence; MET—metastatic disease, REC—recurrence, ns - not specified, npd—not possible to determine; SENS—sensitivity, SPEC—specificity, PPV—positive predictive value; PPV—positive predictive value, NPV—negative predicitive value; *—Numbers correspond to cases histologically investigated, which is not necessarily identical to cases included in the study as a whole. Numbers in bold script at the bottom represent summarized values for all parameters, with corresponding SENS, SPEC, PPV and NPV values calculated for these sums.