Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 14;8(2):72. doi: 10.3390/foods8020072

Table 3.

The relative amount (% of selected bacteria compared to the total bacterial load) of Psychrobacter and Lactobacillus in samples collected early (days 0–7) and late (days 63–91).

Producers Psychrobacter Lactobacillus
0–7 d 63–91 d p-Value 0–7 d 63–91 d p-Value
1 30.7 ± 20.6 50.5 ± 31.5 0.2 5.4 ± 2.9 5.7 ± 8.6 0.9
2 27.1 ± 18.3 0.5 ± 0.9 0.02 0.1 ± 0.2 80.5 ± 9.10 <0.00001 a
3 2.7 ± 5.3 7. 6 ± 6.8 0.1 16.5 ± 11.1 38.3 ± 24.3 0.04 a
4 5.9 ± 3.2 1.2 ± 1.0 0.02 12.4 ± 7.5 79.6 ± 11.2 <0.000001 a
5 9.2 ± 18.5 25.8 ± 20.7 0.2 18.7 ± 11.1 23.4 ± 34.7 0.8
6 25.5 ± 16.8 41.6 ± 14.2 0.09 10.6 ± 13.6 7.7 ± 9.1 0.7
1 b ND 10.0 ± 4.1 0.05 ND 72.1 ± 17.2 <0.00001 a,c

ND, not determined; a Producers with significant increase of Lactobacillus from the early samples (0–7 d) to the late samples (63–91 d). b Additional batch by Producer 1 with lower salt concentration and higher temperature; c p-value calculated for the difference between the late samples of the traditional production from Producer 1 and this Producer’s additional production where a lower salinity and a higher ripening temperature were applied.