Table 2.
SH-SY5Y | SK-N-BE(2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | Cell viability (%) Mean ± SD | p value Drug vs. combination | p value BAY vs. combination | Cell viability (%) Mean ± SD | p value Drug vs. combination | p value BAY vs. combination | |
48 h | 0.4 μM BAY | 79.01 ± 6.26 | 94.04 ± 7.72 | ||||
Paclitaxel | 87.71 ± 7.83 | 90.89 ± 7.86 | |||||
Paclitaxel + BAY | 54.65 ± 3.26 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 72.98 ± 9.33 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Cisplatin | 82.33 ± 9.01 | 98.94 ± 6.48 | |||||
Cisplatin + BAY | 62.47 ± 5.82 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 90.49 ± 7.46 | 0.052 | >0.999 | |
Doxorubicin | 100.5 ± 9.59 | 102 ± 9.68 | |||||
Doxorubicin + BAY | 77.97 ± 8.01 | <0.001 | >0.999 | 93.69 ± 8.78 | 0.121 | >0.999 | |
Temozolomide | 107 ± 11.17 | 107.7 ± 3.65 | |||||
Temozolomide + BAY | 76.81 ± 4.82 | <0.001 | >0.999 | 100 ± 4.36 | 0.132 | 0.181 | |
72 h | 0.4 μM BAY | 80.20 ± 7.62 | 96.97 ± 6.89 | ||||
Paclitaxel | 84.53 ± 4.60 | 88.29 ± 5.19 | |||||
Paclitaxel + BAY | 36.79 ± 3.14 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 59.48 ± 8.81 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
Cisplatin | 73.38 ± 5.89 | 73.99 ± 2.95 | |||||
Cisplatin + BAY | 56.25 ± 5.72 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 73.53 ± 5.94 | >0.999 | <0.001 | |
Doxorubicin | 102.2 ± 8.37 | 101.3 ± 7.56 | |||||
Doxorubicin + BAY | 78.57 ± 7.16 | <0.001 | >0.999 | 93.99 ± 9.68 | 0.053 | >0.999 | |
Temozolomide | 107.7 ± 6.13 | 102.7 ± 4.28 | |||||
Temozolomide + BAY | 74.21 ± 5.99 | <0.001 | 0.217 | 99.74 ± 6.68 | >0.999 | >0.999 |
Cell viability was measured by MTT assay after 48 and 72 h. The control was set as 100% viable cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD from at least three independent experiments. Using two-way ANOVA, a significant effect was observed for both treatment and between cell lines p < 0.001; Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test was used to evaluate differences between treatments, and p values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.